Journal of Official Statistics, Vol.4, No.2, 1988. pp. 113–124
On Autoregressive Model Identification
Ette Harrison Etuk
Abstract:Since Cleveland (1972) introduced the inverse autocorrelation function, it has been recognized as a competitor to the partial autocorrelation function as a time series model identification tool. By using simulated and real data, we have demonstrated that neither of these is consistently more powerful than the other for identification of autoregressive (AR) models. However when the underlying AR process is of full order, the partial autocorrelation function invariably is the superior. But when a subset order AR model generates the data, the inverse autocorrelation function is generally more informative. On the whole the partial autocorrelation function exhibits better performance. For instance, in two of the three cases of real series used it clearly outperforms the inverse autocorrelation function.
Keywords:Autoregressive model identification: partial autocorrelation function; inverse autocorrelation function.
Copyright © Statistics Sweden 1996-2018. Open AccessISSN 0282-423XCreated and Maintained by OKS Group