Journal of Official Statistics, Vol.16, No.4, 2000. pp. 321–330
Attrition and Misclassification of Drop-outs in the Analysis of Unemployment Duration
Johan Bring and Kenneth Carling
Abstract:Carling et al. (1996) analyze a large data set of unemployed workers in order to examine, inter alia, the effect of unemployment benefits on the escape rate to employment. In this article we take a closer look at the 20 percent of workers who were drop-outs and check the empirical justification for modeling attrition as independent right censoring in the analysis of unemployment duration. It may very well be that dropping out, i.e., attrition, often occurs due to employment. In the analysis, we refer to these individuals as misclassified in that they are typically treated as if their unemployment spell went beyond the time of attrition. We propose to follow up the drop-outs by a supplementary sample and apply a multiple imputation approach to incorporate the supplementary information. Our follow-up study revealed that 45% dropped out due to employment. The escape rate to employment was as a consequence underestimated by 20 percent, implying that the effect of unemployment benefits on the escape rate is likely to be much greater than reported in Carling et al. (1996).
Keywords:Follow-up study; informative censoring; multiple imputation; register data; survival models.
Copyright © Statistics Sweden 1996-2018. Open AccessISSN 0282-423XCreated and Maintained by OKS Group